@GrForn Jeg har heller ikke sagt at det er det som har skapt krisen, men det er en utfordring at vi ikke greier å gi tilstrekkelig støtte til Ukraina og andre nærliggende nasjoner når Putin opptrer på den måten han gjør.
RT @carlbildt: Although the 🇷🇺 invasion into parts of Donbas 🇺🇦 is the immediate crisis, the Putin speech yesterday makes it abundantly clear that his objective is to subdue and control 🇺🇦 as a whole. https://t.co/q01Bl0nXn1
RT @TimothyDSnyder: Putin gave his myth about #Ukraine today as a reason to invade. Here is a brief introduction to Ukrainian-Russian history, which might serve as a reply. https://t.co/sZbt9sckMv
RT @GLandsbergis: Ukraine is already under attack: economic, cyber, military. One way to express solidarity with Ukraine is by going to Kyiv. We Baltic Ministers 🇱🇹🇱🇻🇪🇪 are going there later this week. If there is one place where EU politicians should be now – it‘s with our Ukrainian friends!
RT @guyverhofstadt: Putin starts war. Not by accident on 21 february 2014… exactly eight years after the victory of Euromaidan & retreat of his puppet Yanukovych. \n\nSanctions where it hurts needed: end of Nordstream, kicking out Russia of the Swift system and asset freezes of Putin and his cronies!
RT @IanDunt: Western sanctions against Russia must be devastating. Nothing else is acceptable.
RT @olgatokariuk: Putin sends his military to the occupied Donbas. This means an invasion of Ukraine. I hope media don't repeat the 'peacekeeping forces' bullshit. In Kremlinese, 'peace' means war.\nStay strong, Ukraine 🇺🇦\n#StandWithUkraine #SanctionRussiaNow
RT @carlbildt: If I compare with his speech in March 2014 when he 🇷🇺 annexed Crimea this was far more rambling, all-over-the-place and unhinged. And also more dangerous. Now he questions the very existence of 🇺🇦 as a nation. It’s a man with immense power who’s lost contact with reality. https://t.co/d98VeRn2F2
RT @olgatokariuk: If you want to know how Ukrainians react to Putin's speech, here's a glimpse: moms on Facebook discuss putting stickers on their children's clothes, when they go to school, indicating their blood type. Make no mistake: this speech was perceived as a declaration of war on Ukraine
RT @carlbildt: The procedure is now that 🇷🇺 recognizes the two puppet gangster-run entities as independent states, then signs an agreement with them and on the basis of that have 🇷🇺 armed forces entering to protect them. That will be aggression under international law.
RT @anneapplebaum: Putin's speech, to which I am now listening, is so full of historical nonsense that I don't even have the energy to correct it. For example: He skipped, completely, the Ukrainian bid for independence at the time of the Russian revolution.
RT @McFaul: After Hitler annexations and wars, We created the UN Security Council to create laws and norms against annexation, against great powers taking territory from smaller powers. Putin just did that. The world has to respond now. Right now.
RT @MESandbu: Just wondering - do all those who think that Central Europe’s joining NATO was wrong, actually think that without NATO expansion Putin would have blithely have left Russia’s neighbours alone?
RT @carlbildt: Here we go! The existence of 🇺🇦 is all the fault of Lenin - of all people - and should not have been allowed. Putin’s lengthy rambling historic discourse is more revealing about him than of anything else. https://t.co/tXAK3TPv8T
@larsmartinbe @olesaue @HadiaTajik @vgnett @Aftenposten @TrineEilertsen Nei, men «timinga» av angrepet på Aftenposten har i alle fall ført til at VG si sak - som ho på fredag kveld må ha visst var rett rundt hjørnet - drukna i støyen..
Dess meir som kjem fram om @HadiaTajik sine pendlarbustader, dess mindre ser det ut som ei «presseskandale» - berre grundig journalistisk arbeid av @vgnett , @Aftenposten og @TrineEilertsen. Dette var Facebook-storm i eit vassglas. https://t.co/8SGyZQdQ5c
RT @foleask: Nye regler for statsstøtte til klima og energiprosjekter - dette blir tillatt nå:\n https://t.co/Lb7MHtCa6d
Med Ap og Sp i regjering har vi nå den mest rovviltfiendtlige @Regjeringen i Norge siden #ulv ble fredet i 1971. @Venstre vil øke bestandsmålet for ulv til 8-12 ynglinger! @ungevenstre @WWFNorge @NOAHaktiv @rovdyra @Naturvern https://t.co/31DQ4S63sG
Dyreetisk uforsvarlig ulvejakt. Med Arbeiderpartiet og Senterpartiet har vi nå den mest rovviltfiendtlige regjeringen siden ulv ble fredet i Norge i 1971. \n\nVenstre Unge Venstre WWF Verdens naturfond NOAH - for dyrs rettigheter Naturvernforbundet Foreningen Våre Rovdyr